Free speech does of course sustain democracy. Notwithstanding the unqualified language of the First Amendment, the American state legislatures and courts have consistently prohibited various categories of speech, such as bribery, perjury and counselling to murder. Article 10 of the ECHR expressly acknowledges that freedom of expression can be curtailed in the interests of national security or public safety. It is trite law that free speech is not and should not be unlimited. Should flag burning as a form of protest be prohibited? All the Yes points:Īll the No points: It is trite law that free speech is not and should not be unlimited. The law should draw the distinction between the protest and the opinion of the protestor.The prohibition of flag burning prevents the breaches of peace that are prompted by such protests.The national flag is a symbol of nationhood and national unity that ought to be protected from abuse….It does not convey an opinion that a protest… Flag burning is a wholly unnecessary means of protest. ![]() It is controversial even to regard flag burning as an example of free speech.It is trite law that free speech is not and should not be unlimited.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |